Saturday, August 19, 2006

Eroding Religious Liberty

Malaysia is expecting a court ruling any day now that could shake society to its foundations: does a Muslim have the right to convert to another faith?

A Muslim by birth, Lina Joy decided to become a Christian, marry and raise a family. But in Malaysia, where Islam is the official religion, this is an affair of state, not conscience. In 1999, the National Registration Department allowed her to change the name in her identity card to Lina Joy but the ID entry for her religion remained as "Islam". Until the entry is deleted, she cannot legally marry outside the Muslim faith. The legal wrangling began when she took the department to court over the anomaly.

"The fundamental question in Lina's case is whether Muslims in this country can convert?" said political analyst Abdul Razak Baginda.

It's a tricky legal question in multiracial, multi-religious Malaysia. Ethnic Malays, who make up just over half of Malaysia's 26 million people, are deemed Muslims from birth.

"It's political dynamite. It will create instability," Abdul Razak said. "For decades, the position of Malays and Muslims have been guaranteed.

"It will open the floodgates. Now you see Malays are going to convert and the government sanctions that. Definitely there will be a huge backlash and PAS is going to town with it."

Parti Islam se-Malaysia (PAS), the country's biggest Islamic opposition party, agrees.

"It will be a bad precedent," PAS deputy chief Nasharuddin Mat Isa told Reuters. "It will create some uneasiness in the Malay community. It could lead to demonstrations."

But a ruling against Joy could also inflame opinion among non-Muslims, who are already aggrieved over what they see as the gradual encroachment of Islamic law into civil society.

"If they rule against Lina Joy, the whole question of religious liberty -- the freedom of conscience, choice, _expression and thought of an individual -- will be greatly affected," said Wong Kim Kong, secretary-general of the National Evangelical Christian Fellowship Malaysia, which represents about two-thirds of Malaysia's roughly 4,000 churches.

But he agreed that a court victory for Joy could spark a Muslim backlash. "This group may sow discord or even create public disorder that will result in greater polarisation of the races and religion in the country," Wong said.

For Islamic scholars, Joy cannot win.

"If Islam were to grant permission for Muslims to change religion at will, it would imply it has no dignity, no self-esteem," said Wan Azhar Wan Ahmad, senior fellow at Malaysia's Institute of Islamic Understanding.

"And people may then question its completeness, truthfulness and perfection."

Taken from Reuters. It has not been edited in anyway at all. Although these are part of the full report, it does not distort the actual report. This is what is happening in Malaysia and many Islamic and so-called-Islamic nations. An eroding religious liberty. A lost to mankind. An end to human rights. What religion is this that needs to force its "subjects"? There is no love, only perversion & partiality, untruthfulness & imperfection and distortion. Does a god need its worshippers to assure "him" of "his" dignity and self-esteem? If "he" does, then "his" worshippers must be gravely deprived of hope, esteem and dignity.

7 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

The authorities and religion leaders' increasing need to reemphasise and protect their own religion indicates a faltering within the religion and they themselves know it.

If they are so sure of themselves, why the desperation for security?

August 19, 2006 1:36 PM  
Blogger gwyneth said...

"What religion is this that needs to force its "subjects"? There is no love, only perversion & partiality, untruthfulness & imperfection and distortion. Does a god need its worshippers to assure "him" of "his" dignity and self-esteem? If "he" does, then "his" worshippers must be gravely deprived of hope, esteem and dignity."

exactly what i've always felt and wanted to say...i just find it really sad...

August 19, 2006 5:26 PM  
Blogger PabloPabla said...

As what I understand after reading some blogs and sites managed by Muslims, all matters relating to the affairs of a Muslim must be guided by Syariah Law and Quaranic principles. There is no room for the application of civil law. Hence the tug-of-war in respect of Lina. She was born a Muslim and was and is still subject to Syariah Law according to Muslims.

The penalty for apostasy under Syariah Law is death.

I really wonder what is God's will in this matter...and I pray that His sovereign hand will guide the Federal Court Judges when they ultimately make the decision.

August 22, 2006 9:58 AM  
Blogger Philip said...

"If they are so sure of themselves, why the desperation for security?"...
~*insecurity since the rejection of ishmael*~

"exactly what i've always felt and wanted to say...i just find it really sad..."
~*if only they can see the light that guides them to eternal hope*~

"I really wonder what is God's will in this matter...and I pray that His sovereign hand will guide the Federal Court Judges when they ultimately make the decision."
~*i'm eargerly waiting the decision. I'm waiting for a precedent that would favour religious liberty as the constitution promises wihtout any hidden clauses*~

August 23, 2006 1:00 PM  
Blogger lee wei said...

that was a rhetorical question lahhh

August 24, 2006 9:29 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It is funny how some Christian practices do relate to Islamic perversion of the law. Are we in any right as Christians to protest against the condom in our door gift, on being against premarital sex? Are we of any right to stop believers of one church to join another church? If we do not do anything about both the situation mentioned… are we “carrying the blood in our own heads”? Don’t you think the Muslims are doing the same? Don’t you think they are just doing it because they could, and if they don’t set pathetic rules like that, they might be deemed that they are not doing anything about their faith?

I can’t believe I am arguing for the Muslims…I kinda saw it that way. What the judge wanna set as precedence is up to the judge. The judge had better not be Muslim or Christian tho.

So, are we who are of other ideology in any position to force a choice on others because of duty? What is heavier…civil law (law on earth) or Syariah law (law of the faith)? My train of thought might go on forever…tell me if what I am thinking is rubbish, or if answers have alrdy been found for my questions

September 03, 2006 3:40 AM  
Blogger Philip said...

anonynmous..you identify yourself first. no cowardly acts here...

September 04, 2006 11:59 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home