Article 121 (1A)
Article 121 (1A) seems to be the talk of the town. It is part of the Constitution. The Constitution which is supposed to promote human rights and lay the basic rules of a country. According to the Constitution,
Insecurity seems to be the main reason. The fear of a racial or a religious tension would arise from the amendment of the Constitution is real. I am sure some sectors will not tolerate the amendment proposed but if there is no amendment made, will it be just and fair to the non-Muslims? Never in a millennium. If this is so, how just can the Constitution and the courts be? I urge the government to look at the issue from a human rights perspective not a religious one. Let religion be left in the hearts of the people and in places of worship. I do not accept the religion of Islam as the official religion until the government alters the law governing the Muslims. They should also have some freedom of religion. I pity them for not having the freedom we have. Becoming a Muslim is like entering a cage to trap crabs. There is a way in and no legal way out. Maybe there is, but the person is subjected to mockery and punishment.
A rift in the cabinet? I do not think so. I think the non-Muslim ministers are doing their part as representative of the people in voicing our concern. Our concern for our future and hope as free living citizens of this harmonious country.
Note: The author wishes to voice his concerns about the issues of the people. In doing so, he does not hope to offend any parties. All are welcome to comment but comments that contain racial slur, false religious accusations and ill motives will be deleted. This post shall not be used in court against the author or any other party directly or indirectly related to it.
1 Comments:
Yea, I think everyone should have their own religion as they wish in our country. Boy, is this a heated issue in USA, the whole religion thing with the government, it's still going on now.
Post a Comment
<< Home